Maybe your right. Maybe they are thinking next year as well... Segura or someone like him (close to the majors) plus a starter who has won 17 in the league may make them better next year without Headley. I think they are both interesting scenario's. Santana could make them better and I think his time here is done. Richards and Williams should round out the starting rotation nicely.

If your the Padres who are you going to want. Santana with 1.5 years of control left with about $20M still on the books. Or Richards and 5.5 years of control left and very cheap over the next 3 or 4 years.

No on Calhoun. How about Segura and (Conger or Bobby Wilson)?

And they CAN'T have him back!!!! :)

If they want pitching I'm guessing they'd want Richards not Santana.

< Segura and Calhoun would get them thinking. >

You're probably right, although I'd hate to lose either of them never mind both. I don't think I would go any more though.... and greed makes me want something additional in return, like another Frieri.

Do you realize we'll have to give up a good prospect for him?

I think Callaspo is adequate.

Yeah, I wouldn't break the bank to get him.

>Have any of you actually looked at Headley's numbers? Callaspo is a better player.<

I wouldn't go that far - Headley's away numbers look reasonable - of course, it can be difficult to really get a read on NL West players with such extreme parks - San Diego, San Francisco, and Los Angeles being pitchers parks and Coors being an extreme hitter's park.

But I agree that he'd probably cost us too much right now - our farm system is pretty dry, Richards must be untouchable (otherwise, we have no depth at all), and Segura, while he's got appeal, probably won't get it done by himself.

Headley makes 3.4M, Izzy 3.9M, Callaspo 3.1M so they are close Money wise. San Diego would want one of the Angels top 15 prospects and maybe Callaspo if they don't have a replacement for Headley within their organization. Can Segura put up Headley type offensive numbers?

I think the Angels would have to have another team interested in either Izzy or Callaspo before they trade for another third baseman.

Don't sell the farm....soil is too rich!

Callaspo is better? Obviously YOU haven't looked at the numbers.

Besides this, from MLBTradeRumors: "The 28-year-old Headley has hit .269/.373/.415 with seven homers and eight steals this season. The switch-hitter quietly owns a career .300/.366/.444 batting line away from Petco Park and his defense at the hot corner is well-regarded. FanGraphs says he's been the 13th most valuable position player in baseball this season at 3.0 wins above replacement, or WAR."

Callaspo doesn't even show up on the list of 3Bmen:

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=3b&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&season=2012&month=0&season1=2012&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&players=0

He may be better than Callaspo but how much are you willing to give up for that upgrade? A top prospect(s)? They did say they wanted a lot. Also NL numbers are skewed high, imho.

--
Switch-hitter quietly owns a career .300/.366/.444
--

And the Angel switch hitter hit 309/368/436 away from Anaheim last year. Since Callaspo stopped splitting time, he's hitting how he typically hits.. 300/400/450 over the last four weeks.

Also, the parks in the AL West are harder to hit in than parks in the NL West.

Be sure not to let data get in the way of your opinion.

Just to add about Callaspo
2008 305/361/371
2009 300/356/457
2010 hurt wrist
2011 288/366/375

This year Scioscia messed with Callaspo with the 3rd base fiasco, but he's hitting now.

So how much better is Headley?

I agree that on paper, both defensively, and offensively, they are close.

Where Headly is an upgrade - in MY opinion - is the stats that chicks dig, like HRs, RBIs, stolen bases, age, and height.

Headly would be an upgrade - especially over the STUPID platoon of Callaspo & Izturis. ( Where neither one of them gets proper playing time, because of Scioscia's numbskull penchant for trying - Unsuccessfully, I must add - to keep each of them "fresh".)

As long as either one of Callaspo or Izturis is also traded - not necessarily for Headly, but more likely for relief help - than Headly should be a welcome compliment to the team.

We agree that Headley is an upgrade. Probably not huge, probably not significant, but measurable. Which means it can be measured. It's not going to be a six of one or half dozen of the other. Headly will like be a little better.

We agree our 2012 Angels would be a better team if we could get Headley for minor league players.

We agree that Scioscia needs to put a third basemen out there and keep him there.

I would much rather agree with you then disagree with you.

Wouldn't it be great if we could both just stop the name calling? I'll start. I will not call you a name again. If I call you a name, you can call me a liar.

PS.. A liar is about the worse thing you can call someone. If I can't hold my tongue under that penalty, then I can't hold my tongue under any penalty.

" Callaspo doesn't even show up on the list of 3Bmen: "

What a tool you are! He doesn't show up because he doesn't have the qualified number of PA's. Change your filter to "170" min PA and he shows up. Granted he's down the list presently but I see that as a reflection of reduced playing time. You use that argument quite a bit about other players.

Further, if you change your filter to 2011 you'll see Callaspo was better than Headly last year when they both played regularly. Callaspo had the best dWAR in the league last year.