I don't think he's done, but I definitely think there's something going on that we're not being told about, and my question would be, if it's legitimate, why the secrecy? If Utley doesn't want to speak about it, I'm not sure I agree that's reasonable, but why not authorize a doctor, team physician, someone with an actual degree and medical credibility who is familiar with his condition to speak about the situation? To the best of my knowledge, the limited number of medical experts who've opined on Utley's injuries have done so based purely on conjecture without any familiarity, let alone knowledge, of Utley's particulars. Why don't the people who DO know ever speak up?
This is a very similar situation to that of Tiger Woods'. There's been a cone of silence required of all those who work with Tiger Woods for years. Why? Well now there's rampant speculation that Woods was a PED user and there are some very legitimate PED links to Woods.
I don't KNOW anything, but none of this with regard to Utley's injuries, smells on the "up and up" to me.
Many on this board know that my background is finance, and working in the securities markets. Almost without fail in that business, those who claimed to make money with "black box" strategies (where they would claim a high level of sophistication and guard in secrecy their actual investment methodology) were eventually proven to be crooks, scam artists, and cheaters. It's what EVERY con artist does. They tell you it's too sophisticated for you to understand and count on your own personal insecurities about your knowledge base to convince yourself that they're right.