Shocking...I'm totally shocked.
I'd be curious to know who his sources are. Easy to just say you talked to some people and they said this or that. Who are they?
He eludes to Nathan and Cuddyer, two people who were supposedly all about staying with Minnesota forever, leaving because of Mauer....because, well they couldn't possibly be people who left for more money (especially Cuddy, of course)
He writes, 'He didn't notice that some of the teammates who slapped him on the back were also befuddled by his demeanor'...okay, which ones...you say something like that as if it's fact, say who the players are.
He wrote: 'All of them said they believed Mauer viewed criticism aimed at him as ignorant and irrelevant.' While he'd have every right to believe that, they're making assumptions...whoever the anonymous 'they' are.
I have issues with stories that have no actual quotes from actual people...especially when it's talking about what people are saying or thinking. It's easy to say whatever you want, whether it's true or not, under the blanket of anonymity...and even easier to just write whatever you want without having to quote someone where people could, you know, go verify what was supposedly said.
Factual inaccuracies? There isn't one actual quote. I could come on here and say a bunch of people said this or that...and maybe some did...but did they have other reasons, like jealousy, personal agendas, etc? How would we know since we have no idea who said what?
Edited 2/20/12 by ThePuck