• Welcome Guest
Chicago Cubs

Welcome to the Chicago Cubs.
Before posting, please review our Message Board Guidelines

    • We're #1!! USA!! USA!!!
  • 4/4/12
  • archie1338
That's just a study from Fortune 500 companies. These are the ones with the most political clout. What about the thousand other companies that aren't in the Fortune 500? Do you think they can afford to hire lobbyists?
  • Reply to this Message
  • 4/4/12
  • bacubsfan
Spin it anyway you want, the fact remains. Most major corporations don't pay the "highest tax rate in the world"
  • Reply to this Message
  • 4/4/12
  • archie1338
So only the major corporations count? You are only talking about a small percentage of politically connected companies. That's a solid analysis if I've ever seen one.
  • Reply to this Message
Message 408647.28 was deleted
  • 4/4/12
  • bacubsfan
Many changes that the big boys lobby to get done to the tax codes affect all businesses. So your excuse that smaller corporations can't afford lobbyists is moot. They still reap the benefits of the changes in many cases.
  • Reply to this Message
Message 408647.30 was deleted
  • 4/4/12
  • windangit
Are you going to refute what was actually said?
  • Reply to this Message
  • 4/4/12
  • windangit
Since nobody actually made that claim, why does it matter?
  • Reply to this Message
Message 408647.33 was deleted
  • 4/4/12
  • bacubsfan
Did you read the link?
  • Reply to this Message
  • 4/4/12
  • windangit
Yes and it doesn't address the point. Will you ever refute it?
  • Reply to this Message
  • 4/4/12
  • bacubsfan

It proves that the statement that corporate taxes are a major driving factor in the cost of manufacturing being higher in the USA is a false one.

Maybe they should look at executive salaries and compensation. I read somewhere than a 1% reduction in the average CEO's salary could pay the salaries of 1000 people in most Fortune 500 companies.

  • Reply to this Message
  • 4/4/12
  • windangit
The taxes themselves were never the issue. The costs associated with the taxes were.
  • Reply to this Message
  • 4/4/12
  • bacubsfan

The taxes themselves were never the issue. The costs associated with the taxes were.

If the taxes aren't an issue then why does every GOP candidate want to lower them even further?

  • Reply to this Message
  • 4/4/12
  • windangit
I really don't care what they want to do.
  • Reply to this Message
  • 4/4/12
  • archie1338

The taxes themselves were never the issue. The costs associated with the taxes were.

If the taxes aren't an issue then why does every GOP candidate want to lower them even further?

I believe the GOP wants to lower the corporate tax rate and get rid of loopholes at the same time. In effect making it more appealing to companies to operate within the US since they don't have to hire lobbyists and the associated lawyers and tax accountants to get the best possible corporate tax rate money can buy. There is a reason why the Democrats oppose such measures. It's because a lot of lawyers and tax accountants will be looking for employment! But no one ever said that a nation could prosper on the backs of ambulance chasers and pencil pushers.

  • Reply to this Message
  • 4/4/12
  • bacubsfan

There is a reason why the Democrats oppose such measures. It's because a lot of lawyers and tax accountants will be looking for employment! But no one ever said that a nation could prosper on the backs of ambulance chasers and pencil pushers.

Ambulance chasers and pencil pushers, I can see you've got a nice UNBIASED opinion.

  • Reply to this Message
  • 4/4/12
  • archie1338
What else do they do that is a benefit to society?
  • Reply to this Message
Message 408647.43 was deleted
  • 4/9/12
  • bacubsfan

Predicted responses:

Pat Garafalo, is that liberal nutjob Jeanne Garafalo's brother.

Thinkprogress Typical liberal rag.

  • Reply to this Message