• Welcome Guest
New York Mets

Welcome to the New York Mets.
Before posting, please review our Message Board Guidelines

    • Jeff Wilpon is an A Hole
  • 12/5/12
  • nym698641
Because other teams were making moves and the Mets weren't. Just because the Deadline in the 31st doesn't mean you wait until the 31st. Other teams make moves to stay in contention when they can. Last year the Mets in the same position traded away Beltran during the all star break and the team died. This year the Mets did nothing and the team died. They never do anything to add payroll and to help keep a good first half going forward.
  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/5/12
  • METMAINEAC

chicken or the egg.

Bottom line the GM/Owners were evaluating the teams chances of making a run before spending.

So basically, your argument is that the team should have spent and hoped the aquisitions would have maintained first half success into the playoffs.

What acquistions would you have made to achieve this?

  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/5/12
  • 4545_ajd

"Last year the Mets in the same position traded away Beltran during the all star break and the team died."

And we got back Wheeler.

"This year the Mets did nothing and the team died"

And how would you have felt if they had dealt a prospect like Harvey to get a piece and the team still died? Like the Giants did when they traded for Beltran.

  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/5/12
  • AdrianMonk

It is important to maintain financial flexibility.
  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/5/12
  • nym698641
Not when you never use it.
  • Reply to this Message
Message 545923.16 was deleted
  • 12/5/12
  • DFAB

"Mets were 4 games under and 12 games out at the deadline, upgrading the team doesn't only cost money it costs prospect, would it have been worth it at that point?"

I didn't expect the team to make a huge acquisition and give up tons of prospects but I DID expect them to make a trade where all they had to do is basically take on the contract (Krod for example). A trade like that would have costed a nobody prospect and would have just had to pick up the contract. THAT is why I was annoyed at ownership (since they were the ones calling the shots). I honestly believe that they expected to not be competitive last season and when they had "money to spend at the deadline", what they REALLY meant was "we aren't spending because it is pointless since we are out of it." THEN...we started to win and that would have put a ton of pressure on ownership to spend to improve the team due to the team's success. But in the end they didn't have to worry about it since the team collapsed and got to use their "we're out of it anyway" excuse which I believe was the plan since the beginning.

  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/5/12
  • DFAB

"Not when you never use it."

+100000000000

  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/5/12
  • 4545_ajd

"I didn't expect the team to make a huge acquisition and give up tons of prospects but I DID expect them to make a trade where all they had to do is basically take on the contract (Krod for example)."

Who was available like that at that time?

  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/5/12
  • DFAB
I know Krod was available and I'm sure there were others that wouldn't have cost us and good prospects. I obviously can't say SPECIFICALLY which players since I don't have access to any of the information the GM's do. Broxton was traded to the Reds I believe as well...and that was the guy I wanted us to sign from day 1. The decision not to trade for anyone had much more to do with money than anything else.
  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/5/12
  • gomets66

Did he explain why our AAA team plays half way across the world? >>>>

vegas was the ONLY AAA team open. mets didnt have a choice.

  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/5/12
  • gomets66

. The decision not to trade for anyone had much more to do with money than anything else. >>>>

it seems too every year, since mets never add payroll at trade deadline.

  • Reply to this Message
Powered by Mzinga