Well, I'm not interested in rehashing the pros and cons of closers that we had this weekend except to say that I still think the ML consensus is that you're a better team if you have a proven one.
The fact that Johnson won't save 51 games again is sort of irrelevant. The better key would be would he save 90-95% games he enters for a $4 million salary. Would Benoit? Would Dotel? Would Coke? Rondon?
Of these 5 guys, who would most likely save 40?
If you want to say that we don't need Johnson and we can have 4-5 guys close out those 40-50 games that you need to close I would say fine and dandy. When was the last time a ML team had 4 guys with at least 10 saves? Last I saw they're still going to award saves to somebody if the criteria is met. What happens when 1 guy blows it tonight and another tomorrow night? What if you blow 3 saves in 4 games with 3 different guys? Now everyone's brain is messed up. Better to have only one guy be on the spot than your whole bullpen.
Me? I'd feel better with Johnson sitting out there in the 8th inning and the Tigers up by 1 with Benoit trying to get to the 9th.
I like both Coke and Dotel to hold a lead in the 9th than I do Benoit. I have no idea about Rondon but I would guess he will not be the guy....just yet.
I'm all in favor of using your best pitcher at the moment to get the job done that needs to be done, but until the powers that be think you don't need a closer "closer" I think I want one. I'm with Leyland on this.
I doubt we get Johnson anyway, but I'd take him and let Porcello go. I think Smyly is going to be a good one and we won't miss Rick. As to the evenuppidiness of the trade, I'll defer to others. I think we both would have to add something to the pot to make a trade work.