I agree with what you and royalsnut are saying and I am guilty of over-simplifying my position in regards to small-mid market spending allowances versus major markets. The difference in their respective revenues is definitely substantial and it always has been, always will be.
My point - which may very well not be valid - is under Kauffman's ownership, the organization was willing to spend money much more freely because it was important to Ewing and his family to put a winner on the field. The Royals seemed to be a more personal extention of his persona and something he very much looked at as a gift toa great community he felt very much a part of.
I am sure there were many seasons where the profitability of the team was meager and likely even lost money more times than not. I also realize our minor leagues were far more robust and turning out a better quality of player than we have in recent memory and the finances of the day made it possible to lock up players like Brett, McRae, White and Wilson whereas in today's market, we are ultimately destined to lose 2 out of every 3 high caliber players we develop/acquire (eg Dye, Beltran , Damon) but we are also guilty of allowing players (eg Ibanez) to walk when we could have extended their contracts for relative peanuts.
I guess my other point is when you take a city like Philadelphia or the evil St. Louis where the fans have - generally speaking - a deeper emotional investment in their teams than we do, they also hold their respective owners and management to a higher degree of accountability. Folks in Seattle or KC like our teams but we also like our coffee..or barbecue...or jazz...and are too laid back for our own good when it comes to communicating our disdain. That's not a knock against us exactly so much as an simple observation to take from what you will.
All that said, I realize that short of the Glass family digging deeper into their own personal finances and taking a potential loss - which they wouldn't do if their lives depended on it - we are limited on what we can do financially and need to model ourselves organizationally after teams like Oakland, Cleveland, Minnesota, etc who focus their money and energy into revitalizing the minor league pipeline/scouting departments and hoping to see dividends met through internal means and savvy spending externally in the FA market.
Maybe I was just playing the contrarian or Devil's Advocate by drawing a little of the flame away from the feet of the Yankees because I felt their best teams in recent memory were actually built using scrappers and grinders to get the job done and allowing their pitching and defense to carry them deep into title contention as opposed to the reckless spenders they have become in recent years. In any case, I would love to see KC build their rosters around the Park they play in and use that to gain a true home field advantage. Give me a roster of contact/gap hitters with speed to utilize on offense and defense as well as a pitching staff that can keep the ball in play and I believe we will find ourselves halfway home in our pursuit of relevance and consistent competitiveness.
The current formula of spotty starting pitching, awful bullpen arms and hitters that seem unable to get on base or play defense sure as all heck isn't working.