This is spot on.

http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/mets/why_not_us_r72OtSEoXfkBYUgRKxlmd

That link is broken.

Sorry about that. Try this.

http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/mets/why_not_us_r72OtSEoXfkBYUgRKxlmdL

That was an overly negative article. It stated the Mets are "Like, a one in 500 chance." but Vegas has a much more favorable opinion of our chances. They have the Mets currently at 100-1... That said, no team has worse odds to win the WS than the 2013 Mets.

http://www.vegasinsider.com/mlb/odds/futures/

ugh...I don't like those Mr. Met hats AT ALL...

I will be Very curious to see what the Vegas pre-season projections are for total wins for the Mets.

The last 3 seasons they have been within only a game or two of being right on.

They are tacky.

"I will be Very curious to see what the Vegas pre-season projections are for total wins for the Mets.

The last 3 seasons they have been within only a game or two of being right on.
"

Yea I had them the last 2 years, I pushed in 2011, won by a game in 2012. Annoy at myself for not betting earlier in 2011 since the line moved up a half a game, would have won both.

The Mets were 100-1 odds in 69. Of course, not saying these are the 69 Mets ... but can dream none the less. Crazier things have happened. The eternal optimist.

You were claiming that the Bourn chase was all smoke and mirrors and then you link an article that says that they believe there was an earnest effort made to sign Bourn.

Why??