To speculate, when the story broke it was associated with players that purchased drugs or treatments. If Braun received neither, why bring attention to it? Maybe his name wouldnt come up on a consultation. It did, he gave a reason.
Now, all I said was there was no evidence he received PEDs or treatments, replying to a poster who said now there is "evidence" he lied. He was wrong. There is no evidence linking Braun to PED or treatments. That does not mean he didnt lie, or didnt use, and I am not defending him as such. I am just saying it is purely speculative on his part of the story to extrapolate him to use from only a consultation.
Why go to drug dealer for a consultation? Probably because the Dr. knows how a test comes back positive, and the liklihood of a false positive. Braun was looking for a defense, either because he truly was caught in a false positive, or because he wasnt and needed ideas to get off. The fact that he spoke to him does not make him guilty.