did i say that?
no, i said that losing the 11th overall pick in the draft - the 1st unprotected pick in the draft - is a bigger deal than handing out a 4yr/60 mil contract in many ways BECAUSE of the new cba draft spending restrictions....you cant just go "ok well we gave away our 1st rounder, lets throw a ton of money at a hs guy that was a round 1 talent but fell bc of signability"
i personally feel that mlb should change the rule as the mets are requesting it not because it helps us but bc it makes no sense and was a bad decision on the part of baseball to begin w/ ....if we get the 11th pick protected, i think signing bourn is not a bad move
personally, i would go after bourn this year ONLY if the pick is protected....otherwise, i wait until next year and make a run at choo among others