And making deep thinking look great as long as you don't think and it isn't deep.
German Firearms Act of 1937: "No civilian is to have a firearm without a permit and permits will not be issued to [persons] suspected of acting against the state. For Je ws this permission will not be granted. Those people who do not require permission to purchase or carry weapons [include] the whole SS and SA, including the Death's Head group and officers of the Hitler Youth." [Kates, Restricting Handguns pg. 185, 1979]
Adolph Hitler: "The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so." April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler's Tischegesprache Im Fuhrerhauptquartier 1941-1942, [Hitler's Table-Talk at the Fuhrer's Headquarters 1941-1942], Dr. Henry Picker, ed. (Athenaum-Verlag, Bonn, 1951); The original source is notes taken by Hitler associate Martin Bormann, a document called Bormann-Vermerke.
Heinrich Himmler: "Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA-- ordinary citizens don't need guns, as their having guns doesn't serve the State."
1) There was NOT a total ban on weapons.2) the Na zi party was a popular movement; Hitler was ELECTED.
Actually, no. All non-Jewish Germans could get them. Je ws and people in the captured territory could nto. So no, people had the ability to intercede, but did not. Je ws were outnumbered, and facing a POPULAR movement against them. They might have been able to take a few with them, but to think they could have stopped it is incorrect<
You are right . How could 500, 000. J ews beat 60 million. Germans?