Mets are a 4th place team in 2013, with or without Ross and or Vernon Wells. They're not part of the future.
If those are the options, I'd rather trot out Duda everyday and if den Dekker has a fast start in Vegas, bring him up in May/June. Play Nieuwenuis and Valdespin; re-sign Hairston for a RH bat. Let the kids get some PT against lefties.
Let the kids pitch in the BP: Familia, E. Ramirez, Edgin, Carson, Parnell, Hefner. Use Francisco as the closer until the deadline and trade him. Let the young arm who pitched the best in the first half close in the 2nd half.
Let the young guys start: Gee, Niese, Harvey, Mejia. Trade Santana at the deadline and let the Wheeler-era begin.
What's the worst case, the Mets fall one position to 5th?
IMO, 2013 is all about the transition into 2014 and beyond.
i agree with you ,i'd at least call and see what they'd be asking for
we signed Wright and he'll be here for 8 more seasons but unless we improve the outfield and get more offense out there we won't be competing for the first couple of years of David's contract
Soriano is definitely not a part of a rebuilding effort but he could bridge the gap until perhaps Vaughn or Nimmo is ready and allow us to be more competitive over the next couple of years while Wright's in his prime
i agree with most everything you've said except Wright's clock is ticking and while i certainly would never jeopardize any part of our future i'd like to think that we could obtain some significant offensive help that might balance the lineup and make us more competitive now as well as the future
IF we decide to go with Duda,Kirk,and Hairston i'm ok with that too but extending David IMO has changed my perspective somewhat
I hear ya, but signing Cody Ross isn't going to turn the Mets into a playoff contender.
If the Mets can't field a team in 2013 that can compete, they're better off using the year as their final evaluation, so they can go hard in 2014+.
<<"except Wright's clock is ticking"
It is, but if the concern was 2013, the Dickey trade never would have been made. d'Arnaud is going to play in 2013, but Syndergaard probably has an ETA of 2015
>>>"there's got to be better solutions out there than what the mets currently have so go and get the help that you know and mets fans need to feel good going into the season."<<<
While I partially agree that we should spend a bit more, I would not go too far with that.
While making fans "feel good" is a part of business, it is can't be allowed to dictate the direction of the franchise - especially if it just to give some fans short term appeasements that will lead to no overall longer term improvement. I feel that what we've done that here the last 25 years - unsuccessfully.
-I don't want Wells even if they do pay most of his money.-Ross will likely cost more than is worth spending on him at this point.-Bourn, mmmm, not sure about that happening.
But generally, I'd stay away from getting locked into long term commitments right now. We are just now getting out from under a lot of bad money now, and I'd rather stay conservitive right now.
I'm going to let Sandy's off-season plan/moves play out and see where we are come Spring.
So, I agree with you in a sense, but disagree with you also.
it's not so much that i'm concerned with '13 but also '14 and out to '15
how many years of Wright's contract are we willing to sacrifice as we rebuild?
i don't have a good answer for that
i'm not big on Ross but if we can get Soriano on the cheap and then add a Bourjos or Borbon?
we might NOT interfere at all with our long term plan but be more competitive sooner
WOW! Can you get anymore complicated and confusing?
"If those are the options, I'd rather trot out Duda everyday and if den Dekker has a fast start in Vegas, bring him up in May/June. Play Nieuwenuis and Valdespin; re-sign Hairston for a RH bat. Let the kids get some PT against lefties.""Let the kids pitch in the BP: Familia, E. Ramirez, Edgin, Carson, Parnell, Hefner. Use Francisco as the closer until the deadline and trade him. Let the young arm who pitched the best in the first half close in the 2nd half."
How about a more organized plan where players are groomed to assume certain roles instead of hoping that someone falls into the role.
<<"WOW! Can you get anymore complicated and confusing?
How about a more organized plan where players are groomed to assume certain roles instead of hoping that someone falls into the role."
d'Arnaud, Harvey, Wheeler, Flores and maybe a few others can be "groomed". They come with that type of reputation.
Guys like den Dekker, Nieuwenhuis, Duda, Valdespin, E, Ramirez, etc need to prove they can even be major league average. They are not blue chip prospects. They need to show they can hit lefties, cut down on K's, etc, well enough to stay in the majors. At this point, it's 50/50 as to whether they're the type of players the Mets can use. They've all gotten some ML experience, so 2013 may be the final evaluation.