• Welcome Guest
New York Mets

Welcome to the New York Mets.
Before posting, please review our Message Board Guidelines

    • Let's get Starling now
Message 546100.1 was deleted
  • 12/10/12
  • saztastic2012

Depends who the other two are.

We want a good young OF and C.

  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/10/12
  • DFAB
they pretty much gave up everyone I wanted in that single trade...I can't believe how dumb KC is...
  • Reply to this Message
Messages 546100.4 through 546100.5 were deleted
  • 12/10/12
  • saztastic2012
Interesting.
  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/10/12
  • thegooch42
If you trade dickey for starling then you might as well trade wright. Starling is 3-4 years away
  • Reply to this Message
  • To:All
  • 12/10/12
  • 86mex17
No thanks he had like 70 k's in 200 ab's last season we have enough guys who know how to strikeout.
  • Reply to this Message
Message 546100.9 was deleted
  • 12/10/12
  • 86mex17
I hear you but, hes not 2-3 years away more like 3 ,4 with the the 4th year him starting that would put us at 2016, too long for my liking, I think we can find more speddy options, just my opinion
  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/10/12
  • Lipchitz
It would defeat the purpose of resigning Wright and do nothing to move up the Mets' timeline to contention. He wouldn't be my target either.
  • Reply to this Message
Message 546100.12 was deleted
  • 12/10/12
  • saztastic2012
I did not know that, Sandy has made it clear he is ONLY trading for major league ready players.
  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/10/12
  • 86mex17
hes as far away as nimmo
  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/10/12
  • Lipchitz
They can hang on to Dickey and extend him. It just makes no sense to resign Wright and then go out and make trades to push back their competitive window 3-4 years (when Wright will be more expensive and less talented). The Mets have some talented players coming up through the system in the next 1-2 years. Their goal should be to compete when those players are ready, not 3-4 years after when the low levels of the system have caught up. Besides if the Mets move Niese/Dickey they should get a couple high upside low A ball prospects on top of the main piece anyways.
  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/10/12
  • 86mex17
I take it back, but we would need to expand on the deal, IMO
  • Reply to this Message
Powered by Mzinga