• Welcome Guest
New York Mets

Welcome to the New York Mets.
Before posting, please review our Message Board Guidelines

    • SANDY: We Want a "Difference Maker" Back If We Trade Dickey
  • To:All
  • 12/3/12
  • 86kid

Source: Red Sox eye R.A. Dickey
Updated: December 3, 2012, 5:04 PM ET
By Adam Rubin and Joe McDonald | ESPN.com

NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- New York Mets general manager Sandy Alderson spent his first full day at the winter meetings discussing trade options for the reigning National League Cy Young Award winner.

Alderson said his Monday agenda has been busy with meetings with potential suitors for 20-game winner R.A. Dickey. The knuckleballer is under contract for next season at $5 million, but the Mets are serious about trading him this offseason if an extension cannot be reached.

White-Knuckle Time For Dickey?

Could free agent knuckleballer R.A. Dickey join this list of Cy Young Award winners who started the next season with another team?

The suitors include the Boston Red Sox, according to a baseball source. Red Sox GM Ben Cherington and Alderson met Monday afternoon, with New York looking for top Red Sox prospects Jackie Bradley Jr. and shortstop Xander Boegarts in exchange for the Cy Young Award winner, the source said. However, it's unlikely the Red Sox would part with those two prospects.

The Mets met with eight teams Monday about Dickey, the source said.

Alderson insisted he had not resolved to trade Dickey, nor would he say the momentum had moved appreciably in that direction. Still, the GM added, he had not even spoken with Bo McKinnis, Dickey's agent, since arriving in Nashville.

"I don't know whether he's at the hotel," Alderson said. "I haven't met with him. I haven't talked to him."

Only six previous Cy Young winners have opened the following season with another club, according to the Elias Sports Bureau.

Alderson added about the trade talks: "Everything we did today was preliminary. We've met with several clubs on a variety of topics -- not just R.A. We expect to do that the remainder of the afternoon and maybe this evening as well."

He acknowledged also speaking with clubs about left-hander Jonathon Niese.

Alderson said he would be looking for "difference makers" in return for Dickey -- not low Class A prospects. He added that the incoming player would not necessarily have to be an outfielder or catcher -- the two areas of most glaring need for the club.

"What we've tried to say to ourselves is that we have to get back difference makers," Alderson said. "It doesn't have to be a catcher. It doesn't have to be an outfielder. It doesn't have to be anything. But it has to be a difference-maker. Because R.A. is a difference-maker."

Alderson insisted trading a reigning Cy Young winner would not be an indication the Mets are pessimistic about their 2013 chances.

"Are we punting '13? Absolutely not," Alderson said. "This is not about making a trade for four players from the Appalachian League. You have to balance the quality of the player with the potential arrival date of the player, obviously. That's something we're trying to do. But it is important for us if we're going to do something -- and I want to emphasize, we may not -- if we do something, we want whatever comes back to us to have an impact on us as soon as possible."

Alderson said a resolution with Zack Greinke as a free agent definitely could affect how much the Mets could command for Dickey in a trade.

"Any time you're looking at a market, you're looking at options," Alderson said. "The more options there are, the more supply, the lower the demand typically. Working in baseball as it typically does, Greinke will have an impact."

The Mets might give a team a window to negotiate an extension with Dickey.

"Putting aside R.A.'s situation, any time you're providing a window, it complicates things and creates uncertainty," Alderson said. "It's something you'd like to avoid. If you feel you have to grant that, there might be some value to that. It's going to depend from club to club."

Asked if Dickey's popularity and potential fan backlash is a consideration in any potential Dickey deal, Alderson said: "It's a consideration, but in the event we're able to return a 'difference maker,' I think many of our fans are able to understand the value in that. We recognize the value that R.A. represents to us. But I think our fans understand what we're trying to do, where we're trying to go."

Adam Rubin covers the Mets for ESPNNewYork.com. Joe McDonald covers the Red Sox for ESPNBostoncom.


Edited 12/3/12   by  86kid
Edited 12/3/12   by  86kid
  • Reply to this Message
  • To:All
  • 12/3/12
  • 86kid
Even though we have specific needs, I don't mind that Sandy is still of a mind to just get back the best and most advanced talent he can for Dickey, even if it is not an outfielder or catcher. I think we could always spin whatever we get if need be to fill specific needs.
  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/3/12
  • sheadro
You gotta believe he means what he says after the Beltran/Wheeler swap. He had much less leverage in that situation a still got his demands met despite doubts from "rival gm's" and other sources and pundits.the man has shown he can minupluate the market and is tough to get to blink in a stare down. I really want to keep Dickey, but I recognize we need to trade some of our pitching for offense. If Dickey is the man who makes the most sense trading...so be it. It sounds here that there is a better than decent chance that R.A. Is moved.

Edited 12/3/12   by  sheadro
  • Reply to this Message
  • 12/3/12
  • 86kid

I agree, and I have said all along, I think trading Dickey could make the most sense for us going forward. I feel like that even more so now that we have signed Wright for another 7 years. We need to fill holes and increase the depth in this franchise, and Dickey is the best chip we have right now to do that.

Ideally, sure, you'd like to get back players that fill a specific area of need for you, but I don't think that is something that has to be an absolute. What you don't want to do is settle for a lessor talent, just to fill an area of need.

Sandy said that he's of a mind to get back the more talented, and more advanced prospects for Dickey, as opposed to being fixated on filling the need in the outfield or catcher. In general, I think that is fine, especially if the outfielders and catchers being offered are a notch down from say another young arm, or 2nd basemen, or whatever.

Obviously we still need an outfield next year, but I trust Sandy knows that better than anyone, and will address it in a mindful way. Hopefully whatever he does works out.

  • Reply to this Message