this is pretty much a moot point as Bourn is too expensive for us never mind too old
but from purely a baseball perspective i can see a contender making an offer of 3 years and 36 million for example,maybe up to 40 million...Bourn is a good player but he is getting on in years and a 5 year deal would be too much
there's a reason why the Braves,who saw him play for them the last year and a half,didn't go as hard after Bourn than they did Upton and wound up giving Upton 5/75 i think it was
Bourn would make sense for us as one part of a relatively dramatic set of moves/deals to make us a contender by next season....right now to tie up 12-13 million a year in him with our team right now just wouldn't make sense even if we could afford it