Heres the link.

<http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/11/heyman-on-damon-scutaro-red-sox.html

Let's see here:

1. He's 36 years old
2. He doesn't solve our cleaup hitter problems
3. He'd hit 10-15 homers max playing for us
4. We didn't sign him 4 years ago when he still would've been a really good addition
5. He's limited to LF defensively and has a weak arm
6. He might cost us more than 1 year on his contract
7. His one skill is getting on-base (which is good, but when you have nobody other than Pablo to drive him in, what's the point?)

PERFECT SABEAN SIGNING

Yup, perfect.

Feliz and Damon....chaammpionssshipppp

Can someone please explain to me why the Giants would be interested in Johnny Damon?

Because Sabean likes cavemen.

"Giants- So easy even a cave man can hackslopslapswing"

i hope not, we dont have a DH spot open for him...

Perfect, absolutely fn perfect.

Spit

C'mon, I highly doubt the Giants are going to pursue an aging Damon for the outfield.

Now, an aging Matsui, that's another matter.

The key question is: Why would he want to play in SF, assuming the Yankees want him back?

Please....no.

i smell another dave (bipper) roberts signing. go get him slobean. this is right up your bazoo.

Why wouldn't we want Damon for 2 years? A discriminating bat that sprays hits all over the field, good clubhouse presence. Decent fielder, crappy arm. If the price was right, I'd take him. But I think he wants to stay with the Yanks, and failing that- the east coast.

Surely you're joking?

why do you think that?

It's either that or pass the bong.

good one, you always this clever?

When I read statements like that, I guess so.

If you're asking me if I'd rather have him in LF next year than Velez or Lewis?

Absolutely.

But if we're going large dollar on a left fielder to out-bid the Yankees/Bosox, then I'll take Bay for a few dollars more.

Damon is precisely the kind of player that the Yankees can afford to have go lame with age-related injury while we cannot.

Pass!