"The Blue Jays have a better chance with Roy Halladay to either win the division or the Wild Card in 2010. Again it matters which direction this team goes in. If they plan on doing a mini rebuild and plan to contend in 2012-2013, then Halladay isn't staying after he hits FA and means you have to trade him this offseason. If the Blue Jays want to contend next season, having a pitcher like Halladay is a plus. Your talking about one of the best pitchers in all of baseball. If you get an amazing package that blows you away and makes your team better, then yes you do the deal.
Your question asks beyond 2010, so I'm assuming like around 2012/2013. If so, the Blue Jays should trade Halladay this offseason, if they want to have a better chance at making the playoffs in 2013. If they want to contend next season (which I think they could if they raised payroll), then you keep him."
Silvio, the goal of the poll was the future of the Jays. IMO 2010, is a bit of a retooling year to let some contracts fade out or be traded a la Overbay, Ryan etc.
If we keep Halladay and extend him, close to 50 million of our payroll ends up on the plates of VW and Halladay. (And before any of you knuckleheads say trade VW.....he can't f*cking be traded.)
So realistically we have to field a team with 75 million remaining. And judging by what the knucklehead fans want, they want some big name players. Those big name players, make big name money....in the neighbourhood of 15-20 mill a year. So say we signed one or 2 of those guys, we're looking a 65-80 million minimum tied up into 4 players. The max I see our payroll with Beeston's chattering of late is 125 million. So for 21 players, 45 million is gonna have to cover it.
Roy has to be traded in order to bring in 2 or 3 "A" prospects or 2 "A" prospects & 2 "B" prospects in order to reduce our dependence on payroll and allow us to be players in the free agent and Amateur Draft market going over slot for players that have major upside.
Silvio, wasn't calling you a knucklehead, just the fans that can't seem to piece together that in order to contend with the Yankees/Sox/Rays & O's(2 or 3 years) and have a payroll of 125 million, we can't have 20 players on the team making 15 million each a year.
Edited Nov-3 by gibbers07