You miss the point, YBC-completely! I have no objection to a dozen people posting twice daily each that they miss Sutton and want him back, or that they can't stand Schulte. That's their prerogative, just as it was mine to gripe about Sutton's style on more than one occasion (or yours to bash "Fat Joe" ad nauseum). By the way, I believe I only started three threads on that topic, all before the suspension, if you want to term that "multiple" threads. I did participate in two or three threads initiated by others, as any number of other posters did.
My point, the one you keep missing, is that it's not fair to resent Schulte, as though he stole the job from Sutton. That idea has been implied between the lines numerous times, if not by you, then by many others.
Who am I to tell people what they can post and what they can't? What I HAVE done is to try to steer people away from believing that there is some sort of contest between the entertainment value of Schulte vs. that of Sutton when he was here. I was trying to make the point that, in my opinion (to which I am entitled) Schulte is an innocent victim in this affair, which many do not seem to view that way. That's far different than attempting to stifle posts on the subject, as you are expressly accusing me.