Actually....Roberts may have done us a favor by striking down the commerce clause argument and labeling it a tax. This law will be challenged again based on that. This did not pass as a tax bill. Even if it stands, we can now push Congress to rescind the tax. Roberts may have pulled a fast one on Owe-Ba-Mao. Also, since it is a 'tax' now, it comes under the filibuster proof reconciliation act.
This was Roberts, being pressured by Leahy and the liberal media, protecting "his court" while allowing the Republicans to easily overturn it. I predicted these weeks ago, amongst friends here at work, that this is how it would go down. Up until yesterday they told me I was nuts and that Roberts was a right wing nutjob.
He was appointed by the statist Bush and Bush is just like his statist dad who appointed the statist Souter who is just like the statist Roberts.
These people - Bush, Obama, Romney, etc, represent the Ruling Class Elite.
BTW - did you read the opinions and the dissents? I spent TOO MUCH time reading them.
Ginsberg writes the worst opinions on earth. She quoted more liberal media anecdotal pieces than she did law. EASILY the worst justice in the history of the SC - but what did you expect from an ACLU boss?
Oh well - this just fires up the anti-Obama vote and pretty much guarantees Romney's election. I was actually at peace with the fact that, if overturned, it would enrage OBama'a base to get out and vote for him and we would have no ObamaoCare and Obama for 4 more years. Now, we get the obverse.
My biggest issue - and where Base and I will ALWAYS disagree - is that the Fed govt screws up and ruins everything they touch - and now the thing they get to destroy is our health and our children's health.
Eugenics in action. Ted Turner and his progressive Georgia Guidestones are going to get their way:
"Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature."
Edited 6/28/12 by ty mccobb