"I've seen talk that his numbers aren't sustainable because the league will adjust to him and because of his high BABIP."
I'm not exactly sure how BABIP works, but doesn't it work under the assumption that the average BABIP is .300 and so if you're BABIP is higher, that means you'll regress to .300 at some point?
Isn't that...ridiculous? For guys that are incredible hitters, SHOULDN'T their BABIPs be well over .300?
Trout is a guy who is legitimately capable of hitting over .300. He has a BABIP of .400 or so, which is insane, but then, he's an incredible hitter. He's above average, and he should always be above average. Therefore, HIS BABIP average should NOT be .300, right? Particularly since he doesn't hit very many HRs, which don't factor into BABIP? And he's likely not a guy with a sub .300 BA, so a BABIP of .300 means he would have a BA quite a bit below .300?
How ELSE does a guy like Trout, who also K's a lot, keep his BA up?
If I got this right, it seems like saber-geeks don't use their heads very much...